The Evolving AI Data Center Narrative
As someone who tells stories for a living, it is difficult for me not to notice when a narrative is evolving.
The executive was genuinely confused.
Was this a foreign attack? Who was organizing all this? Why had the public suddenly become so resistant to data centers?
I observed his martini glass. The drink arrived ceremoniously, three olives laid on ice in a tiny glass container beside it like a garnish, a waiter in pressed white and black hovering nearby. I adjusted myself on the plush velvet chair and told him a story I could guess few people in that room could relate to.
On a reporting trip, I visited the home of an older woman whose mother, during the single-digit temperatures of the previous winter, chose to bundle herself in layers of clothing rather than turn on the heat. She was afraid of her utility bill. That woman found her answers, and found that data centers were part of the reason for her mother’s suffering.
She, like many others I had observed, was part of the data center resistance. Her pain did not exist only in hyperbolic social media echo chambers. It came from real confusion about unaffordable energy prices, and a sense that no one powerful was being asked to fix it.
The executive paused for a long moment when I finished the story.
“I think,” he said, carefully choosing his words. “Technology companies are going to have to pay for the energy they require.”
As a reporter, part of my job is straightforward parroting — he said this, she said that. But what interests me even more is tracking how narratives evolve and why. And right now, I am watching the narrative around data centers and AI shift in real time.
It wasn’t long ago that the dominant message from AI’s most prominent voices was blunt about what the technology meant for ordinary people. I’ll never forget the jolt I felt arriving in New York City and seeing a billboard that read “Stop Hiring Humans,” beside a person too polished to be real. It was an ad for an AI agent company, and it made headlines for exactly the reason the marketers intended. “Provocative” conversation starter.
But the sign was probably the most honest version of a message that had been circulating for years. Leaders in the AI field, such as Elon Musk, built a rhetorical framework around human obsolescence. Humans were inefficient, expensive and now replaceable. It was a pitch that seemed to thrill investors and inflame everyone else, arriving precisely when inflation was rising, the job market felt unstable and the country was on the verge of minting its first trillionaire.
For people already living with economic anxiety, AI was not arriving as a solution. It was another threat.
And that threat compounded as new models were rapidly released. AI made rapid advances in design, writing, and coding, menacing artists, journalists, editors, and eventually the engineers who built the systems in the first place.
The accumulation of those anxieties is visible in the data. A recent Gallup poll found that seven in ten Americans do not want an AI data center built near them. More Americans say they would rather have a nuclear power plant next door.
Politicians who once courted tech companies and data center development are now facing constituents in packed town halls, carrying signs, raising questions about rising prices, environmental damage and surveillance.
For some people, that resistance makes complete sense. For others, like the executive I recently met, it is genuinely baffling.
And the gap between those two reactions is influenced by the narrative of AI the person lives inside. The people I interview who are watching their energy bills climb and calculating payment plans they can’t keep up with, lean towards data center resistance. Others I’ve spoken with who see the technology as representing wealth, career opportunity, or national competitiveness, view resistance as irrational.
Hence the proliferation of the foreign actor narrative.
I have heard the foreign actor discussion from multiple sources in multiple settings. The suggestion is that organized resistance to data centers is not organic — that malicious foreign operatives are behind it, manufacturing the outrage and funding the people protesting.
What research does tell us is that foreign operatives more often seize on existing fractures than create new ones. For example, researchers wrote in Foreign Affairs magazine about this dynamic in the Ukraine context. What appeared to be Americans parroting Russian disinformation was, after closer examination, Russian intelligence amplifying talking points that had originated on the American right by politicians and other Americans.
And alongside the foreign actor narrative is a deliberate effort to reset the AI story for the public.
This effort is taking place on multiple fronts simultaneously.
Executives are talking less about AI replacing humans and more about AI augmenting them, a partner rather than a predator. There is a coalescing around a national security argument, framing U.S. leadership in AI as a patriotic imperative in a global competition that genuinely exists. And there are highly influential cultural figures — Reese Witherspoon and Mel Robbins among the most prominent (and criticized) — encouraging women specifically to embrace AI as a tool for empowerment and equality.
These are pivots, and I don’t mean to suggest they are coordinated. But the goal of these growing narratives is to sand down the sharper edges of what was said before, and open a lane toward something more of the public might actually accept.
As a reporter who tries to speak with everyone, going back and forth between parties to capture how everyone feels, I can see how hard these messages are landing. People receiving these messages are increasingly distrustful of institutions sending them out, and many groups are operating inside algorithmic environments that reward hyperbole and amplify cognitive dissonance.
But there are also a number of people frustrated that their concerns are not heard.
I think often about a man I watched at a data center town hall in Montgomery County, Maryland. When his turn came to speak, he looked directly at the county executive and asked a question so frank it almost made me laugh out loud.
“Do you really care about what we’re all saying here,” he said, “or is this just some kind of Machiavellian exercise?”
It is a feeling many people echo online.
Are their concerns really being addressed? Are things really getting better? Can they trust the narrative shifts?
Subscribe and Share
If this is the kind of stuff you want more of, subscribe. I'm going deeper on this. And if you know someone who should be paying attention to this, send it to them. Or maybe you just want to make a one-time donation to keep this Substack alive.
Follow me on TikTok!
Follow me on Instagram too!
And here is my LinkedIn.
Order a signed copy of my sci-fi novel The Herd- When Democracy Falls.
And remember,…
